Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.linguistics.stackexchange.com/ with https://linguistics.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I like Isaac Moses's answerIsaac Moses's answer but would suggest extending it:

Of course some judgement must be applied as there are good leading questions, followup questions, side questions, and bonus questions.

But for questions that don't seem to be good examples of any of those even striking out the extra questions might be good since we'll still be able to see them and argue if any should be reinstated etc before fully deleting them.

I like Isaac Moses's answer but would suggest extending it:

Of course some judgement must be applied as there are good leading questions, followup questions, side questions, and bonus questions.

But for questions that don't seem to be good examples of any of those even striking out the extra questions might be good since we'll still be able to see them and argue if any should be reinstated etc before fully deleting them.

I like Isaac Moses's answer but would suggest extending it:

Of course some judgement must be applied as there are good leading questions, followup questions, side questions, and bonus questions.

But for questions that don't seem to be good examples of any of those even striking out the extra questions might be good since we'll still be able to see them and argue if any should be reinstated etc before fully deleting them.

Source Link
hippietrail
  • 14.8k
  • 13
  • 15

I like Isaac Moses's answer but would suggest extending it:

Of course some judgement must be applied as there are good leading questions, followup questions, side questions, and bonus questions.

But for questions that don't seem to be good examples of any of those even striking out the extra questions might be good since we'll still be able to see them and argue if any should be reinstated etc before fully deleting them.