6

Like a lot of academics, I'm way more narrowly specialized than is really convenient. So a lot of the questions I'd be inclined to ask here would be of the form "Can anyone point me to research on X question from Y perspective?" — where Y is some subfield within linguistics that I'm not terribly familiar with. Is this a legitimate use of the site?

| |
  • Can you provide an example of the questions you have in mind? It can be a banal example, it doesn't matter, just to make us understand what you were thinking about. :) – Alenanno Sep 26 '11 at 16:03
  • 1
    @Dan do you mean questions like this? : linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/522/… – Louis Rhys Sep 26 '11 at 16:42
  • 2
    also, if you want references in particular, I have been trying to popularize the [reference-request] tag – Artem Kaznatcheev Sep 27 '11 at 5:13
  • 1
    Louis Rhys -- Yes, that's the sort of thing I was thinking about when I posted this. – Leah Velleman Oct 3 '11 at 13:42
6

Yes, that is perfectly acceptable. It is about linguistics, and has a clear but arguable correct answer.

| |
  • 1
    +1 I totally agree. This is pretty standard on most of the SE sites I participate in. – hippietrail Sep 26 '11 at 17:26
2

I think it is acceptable as long as the scope is specific and unambiguous enough. Keep in mind we decided to discourage open ended questions.

| |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .