Should the questions of identifying language be on-topic?

Question

This question has been recently asked.

Should questions about identifying languages be on-topic here?

Pro's

• Such Q's are often interesting by themselves;
• They may highlight some unusual usage of common languages or provide an interesting info about extinct or rare ones;
• They may let the users to demonstrate their erudition (may be an important concern for someone);
• At the moment, Linguistics.SE needs more users and more questions, so even if such questions are not {yet} on-topic, they may be included;

Con's

• There may be disputes on which language it is, provided that several relative languages or dialects may apply;
• They are not about linguistics! :)

Answer 1

Note: in the years since this was written, the community has since decided that these questions are no longer allowed.

---

As you say, there are several good reasons to allow them, and that is enough for me. I vote yes.

Answer 2

Few considerations:

• Methods of automated language identification given a text belong to linguistics. So language identification per se is not off-topic, but just this particular type of language identification as it includes listening to a recorded speech sample.

• Sometimes identified language family or even a geographic area could be enough for the asker

Also it is not clear to me how language identification should be performed in principle. A web site where speakers of all possible languages listen to all samples provided by askers doesn't seem feasible.

Answer 3

More questions is ok with me!

And if there are some disputes about exactly which dialect/language it is then I look forward to some well argued linguistic analysis.